The views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the editorial opinion of Blood Red Patriots or its editors.

  • Was There FBI Involvement In Officer Phillip Cardillo's Murder At Mosque?

    Was There FBI Involvement In Officer Phillip Cardillo’s Murder At Mosque?

    Don't forget to Like Blood Red Patriots on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter.

    On Thursday, Judicial Watch announced that it had filed lawsuits against the Department of Justice, the city of New York and the New York Police Department over information concerning possible FBI involvement the murder of a New York City Police Officer’s murder at a Nation of Islam Mosque in 1972 in Harlem.

    Officer Phillip Cardillo was killed while responding to a fake “10-13” officer in distress phone call at a mosque that housed Louis Farrakhan’s office on the third floor.

    Judicial Watch Chief Investigative Reporter Micah Morrison wrote an article on what took place titled “Did an FBI call accidentally kill an NYPD officer?”:

    A 10-13 is every cop’s worst nightmare, a red alert meaning “officer in distress.”

     

    Two policemen, Phillip Cardillo and Vito Navarra, rushed to the address, which was the Muhammed Mosque #7 of the Nation of Islam. Its leader, Louis Farrakhan, had offices on the third floor.

     

    The mosque doors, usually bolted shut and manned by the Nation of Islam’s own paramilitary force, the Fruit of Islam, were unlocked and unguarded.

     

    In the reception area, Cardillo and Navarra encountered six men. Navarra darted up the stairs. Somewhere up on the second floor, he believed, a brother officer was in serious trouble. He was met by 10 men who forced him back down the stairs.

     

    Nine more cops rushed into the reception area. A fight broke out.

    Cardillo died six days after being wounded, and a suspect was tried twice, but never convicted.

    Judicial Watch is now seeking documents to determine the FBI’s involvement in the officer’s death.

    Judicial Watch reports:

    Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Justice after it failed to adequately search for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s May 15 FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:17-cv-024687)). Judicial Watch seeks:

    • All records concerning the Nation of Islam Mosque #7 in Harlem, Manhattan, New York City, or the building located at 102 West 116th Street. This request includes, but is not limited to, all informant, wiretap, electronic surveillance, and physical surveillance records relevant to the Nation of Islam Mosque #7, located at 102 West 116th Street, in New York City.
    • The time frame for the request was identified as January 1, 1970 to January 1, 1973.

     

    Judicial Watch argues that the DOJ “has violated FOIA by failing and/or refusing to employ search methods reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of records responsive to accordingly, failing and/or refusing to produce any and all non-exempt records responsive to the [FOIA] request.”

     

    Judicial Watch sued New York City and the NYPD after they failed to respond to June 5 Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) requests (Judicial Watch v. The City of New York and the New York City Police Department (No. 0160286/2017)). Judicial Watch seeks:

    • The audio tape of the 10-13 “officer in distress” call recorded by the Police Communications Division at 11:41 m. on April 14, 1972; and
    • The Major Case Squad report and files on the homicide of NYPD Patrolman Philip Cardillo.

    In its complaint, Judicial Watch notes that, “[NY City and NYPD] have yet to provide one responsive document and only have provided conclusory, unsubstantiated, non-specific bases for denial by an individual with no personal knowledge of the underlying investigation.”

     

    Judicial Watch disputes the claim made by NY City and the NYPD that the case is ongoing. Judicial Watch also points out that the denial of its records request is missing key information required by the open records law.

    The entire background behind the FOIA request and what is known about that case is recounted in Micah Morrison’s Investigative Bulletin titled “Killing Cardillo: What Did The FBI Know And When Did They Know It?”

    In that piece, Morrison wrote:

    Confidential FBI documents released under the Freedom of Information Act raise questions about the extent of the FBI’s involvement in the Cardillo affair.

     

    One COINTELPRO [FBI’s secret counterintelligence program during the Nixon administration] tactic was the use of anonymous or “pretext” phone calls — FBI agents posing as someone else — to disrupt targeted groups.

     

    A February 1968 COINTELPRO memo from the FBI’s New York field office to headquarters seeks permission to make “anonymous and other pretext phone calls . . . to neutralize and frustrate the activities of these black nationalists.”

     

    The anonymous phone calls could sow dissent (“there’s an informant in your ranks”) or even get the police to conduct raids and break up meetings.

     

    Six targets are noted in the memo. Four of the names have been blacked out by FBI censors.

     

    “Could that fake 10-13 call sending cops to the mosque have been an FBI ‘pretext call’ gone terribly wrong?” asks Jurgensen [NYPD detective in charge of Cardillo investigation]. “Or could the FBI have had a high-level informant inside the mosque who was somehow involved and has been protected all these years? I don’t know. Only the FBI knows. But look at the Whitey Bulger case in Boston — there’s a situation where an individual was both a killer and an FBI informant.”

    Could the FBI bear some bit of responsibility for Officer Cardillo’s death?  It certainly seems likely with the information that is currently known.  The question now is, will Judicial Watch get the information to determine if they are to blame and if there will be any justice brought in the matter.

    If anyone can expose the truth in this matter, Judicial Watch has demonstrated time and again that they are the ones that will stick to it until they get the answers.

    Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

    Source link