• Mike Pompeo Tells Embassy in Venezuela to Come Home

    Mike Pompeo Tells Embassy in Venezuela to Come Home

    Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced Monday he is pulling remaining U.S. Embassy staffers from Venezuela because of the country’s worsening situation.

    “The U.S. will withdraw all remaining personnel from [the Caracas embassy] this week,” Pompeo tweeted late Monday night. “This decision reflects the deteriorating situation in [Venezuela] as well as the conclusion that the presence of U.S. diplomatic staff at the embassy has become a constraint on U.S. policy.”

    The announcement comes as Venezuela continues to descend into chaos. Its government is currently attempting to restore electricity after four days of blackouts around the country, the latest in what has become a humanitarian crisis for the socialist country led by Nicolas Maduro. READ MORE...

  • These 3 Doctors in Congress Diagnose the Problems With Medicare for All

    These 3 Doctors in Congress Diagnose the Problems With Medicare for All


    Few issues have animated conservatives as much as Obamacare. But there’s a new threat on the horizon. It’s called Medicare for All—and it would be a massive government takeover of your health care.

    The Daily Signal spoke with three medical doctors who are serving in the U.S. House—Reps. Scott DesJarlais, Paul Gosar, and Andy Harris—to talk about Medicare for All and their solutions for a patient-centered alternative. Listen to the podcast or read the transcript below. READ MORE...

  • Ted Deutch Calls Out Fellow Democrats for Leniency on Ilhan Omar’s ‘Anti-Semitic Lies’

    Ted Deutch Calls Out Fellow Democrats for Leniency on Ilhan Omar’s ‘Anti-Semitic Lies’

    Democratic Florida Rep. Ted Deutch criticized Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar on Thursday for spreading “classic anti-Semitic lies” and said his fellow House Democrats aren’t doing enough to hold her accountable.

    Deutch criticized Democrats for changing a House resolution condemning anti-Semitism to include other forms of hate.

    “Why are we unable to singularly condemn anti-Semitism? Why can’t we call out anti-Semitism and show that we’ve learned the lessons of history? It feels like we’re only able to call the use anti-Semitic language by a colleague of ours, any colleague of ours, if we’re addressing all forms of hatred. And it feels like we can’t call it anti-Semitism, unless everybody agrees it’s anti-Semitism,” Deutch said in a passionate speech on the House floor. READ MORE...

  • Portland Putting Itself at Risk by Leaving the Joint Terrorism Task Force

    Portland Putting Itself at Risk by Leaving the Joint Terrorism Task Force

    Last month, the Portland, Oregon, City Council voted to leave the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force, one of our nation’s first lines of defense against terrorism.

    “We want to direct our resources towards actual threats,” city Commissioner Chloe Eudaly said.

    But that’s exactly what the Joint Terrorism Task Force is doing. Leaving the task force will only harm real counterterrorism investigations.

    Joint Terrorism Task Forces around the country are responsible for investigating, detecting, prosecuting, and removing terrorists and terrorist organizations. READ MORE...

  • It’s Not Wise to Depart From Bipartisan Agreement on Our Nuclear Triad

    It’s Not Wise to Depart From Bipartisan Agreement on Our Nuclear Triad

    The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee demonstrated a scary lack of understanding of nuclear weapons policy Wednesday during a hearing seeking outside perspectives on the U.S. nuclear posture.

    Chairman Adam Smith, D-Wash., jumped at the opportunity to attack the U.S. fleet of intercontinental ballistic missiles, known as ICBMs, calling them unnecessary for deterrence and easily identifiable targets.

    Smith misunderstands the value that ICBMs bring to U.S. national security and that of our allies, which is scary given the importance of the role he plays. READ MORE...

  • How Liberal Companies Are Bringing Blue State Mindsets to Red States

    How Liberal Companies Are Bringing Blue State Mindsets to Red States


    Amazon isn’t the only one fed up with New York’s ridiculous tax rates. Plenty of companies are packing their bags and looking for office space in states with more business-friendly policies. There’s just one problem: A lot of these top firms can’t stand the conservative laws that make their new homes so successful.

    AllianceBernstein, another firm fleeing the Empire State’s stifling economy, just announced that it’s relocating its $70 million headquarters to Nashville. But before it moves, the CEO is warning Tennessee: It’s not a fan of religious liberty. And AllianceBernstein is proving it by fighting the state’s faith-based adoption bill. READ MORE...

  • The Left Is Doubling Down on Schemes to Pack the Supreme Court

    The Left Is Doubling Down on Schemes to Pack the Supreme Court

    Anything the left can’t control, it aims to destroy.

    From campaigns to abolish the Senate to the growing movement to upend the Electoral College after Hillary Clinton’s defeat in the 2016 presidential election, progressives have few qualms about getting rid of long-standing constitutional institutions.

    Now they’re doubling down on their efforts to wage war on the Supreme Court.

    Former Attorney General Eric Holder said Thursday that Democrats should consider court-packing during an appearance at Yale, noting that he would try to add two seats if he were president. READ MORE...

  • Majority of House Democrats Vote to Let 16-Year-Olds Vote for President

    Majority of House Democrats Vote to Let 16-Year-Olds Vote for President

    A majority of House Democrats on Wednesday voted to lower the federal voting age from 18 to 16.

    A number of high-profile Democrats voted in favor of the legislation, including California Reps. Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, Maxine Waters, and Ted Lieu; Democratic presidential candidate and Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard; New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib; and Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar.

    Democratic Massachusetts Rep. Ayanna Pressley introduced the legislation Tuesday evening as an amendment to House Democrats’ For the People Act, which would overhaul federal election laws. READ MORE...

  • Media Ignores Ilhan Omar’s Anti-Semitic Comments

    Media Ignores Ilhan Omar’s Anti-Semitic Comments

    Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, stirred controversy again with an anti-Semitic tirade last week, declaring to a packed audience, “I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is OK to push for allegiance to a foreign country [Israel].”

    According to the Media Research Center, “CBS This Morning” devoted 30 seconds of air time to Omar’s comments Monday—while the other two broadcast networks didn’t cover it at all.

    Many in the media have downplayed this incident. ABC News even called it a, quote, “family feud.”

    And others in the media seem to be making excuses for the representative.

    Liberal economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman actually argued that he’s not worried about anti-Semitism when it comes from the left, and insinuated that only right-wing anti-Semitism is bad.

    He wrote in a Tweet: “There are three things in life that are certain: death, taxes (unless you’re Donald Trump), and persistence of anti-Semitism. But only one brand of antisemitism scares me – and it’s not on the left.”

    There are three things in life that are certain: death, taxes (unless you’re Donald Trump), and persistence of anti-Semitism. But only one brand of antisemitism scares me – and it’s not on the left pic.twitter.com/bvWmFfM945

    — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) March 6, 2019

    Amazingly, bigotry is now excused as long as you are on one side of the political spectrum.

    While the dismaying surge of anti-Semitism in Congress is a worrying sign, it does not represent the American people in general.

    As a whole, America has been a shining city upon a hill for Jews, a place where all may live according to the dictates of their conscience under just and equal laws.

    In 1790, George Washington set the tone for his new country when he wrote to a Jewish congregation in Newport, Rhode Island.

    Washington wrote, quote: “May the children of the stock of Abraham who dwell in this land continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other inhabitants—while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and fig tree and there shall be none to make him afraid.”

    The words of Washington should stand as a rebuke to those maligning Jews, who have contributed greatly to the history of this country and our success today.

    Source link

  • It’s Time for Congress to Defend Free Speech on Campus

    It’s Time for Congress to Defend Free Speech on Campus

    As an undergraduate student during the ‘60s, the Vietnam War was often on our minds and in our conversations.

    I vividly remember the discussions. Students were debating professors and each another. Ideas were being exchanged, opinions formed, and unique perspectives shared.

    I saw firsthand how college campuses across the nation were hubs of free speech—and some of that speech I vehemently disagreed with, in all honesty. Yet as a soldier years later, I would fight to protect and defend this right to free speech. As a country, we were best served by allowing all sides to passionately argue their views.

    In the decades since, our colleges’ commitment to protecting free speech has eroded. Examples have piled up of students silencing and attacking speakers with whom they disagree, as well as students being arrested for violating their college’s policies on “free speech zones.”

    Time and again, university leaders stand by and just allow this to happen.

    The designation of a “free speech zone” is a particularly egregious example of how colleges limit free speech. These small parcels of land—often just a tiny fraction of the campus—are the only places students can freely engage in expressive activity, such as distributing fliers or holding a rally or protest. Students caught engaging in these activities outside the free speech zone can be subject to arrest, harassment, and discipline.

    Roughly 10 percent of American colleges now restrict constitutionally protected speech to a particular corner of campus, according to a recent report, and 30 percent of colleges have restrictive speech codes. These regulations prohibit the kind of student expression that is typically protected by the First Amendment.

    And disturbingly, students increasingly approve of these policies. A national study last year found that about one-third of students supported restricting free speech on their own college campus.

    President Donald Trump has shown a strong commitment to protecting the free speech rights of college students. He recently announced an executive order that will require colleges to honor free speech on their campuses in order to remain eligible for up to $26 billion of federal research funding.

    The president’s proposal sheds critical light on this issue. We should continue to send a strong message to institutions of higher education that free speech restrictions are at odds with our constitutional rights.

    Congress likewise cannot sit idly by while college campuses restrict free speech. For this reason, I have introduced a resolution in the House of Representatives supporting the right to free speech, and admonishing institutions that aim to limit this right. It also calls on universities to abolish their free speech zones and recommit themselves to protecting the free and open exchange of ideas.

    My resolution affirms the House of Representatives’ commitment to being a guardian of free speech in America, including on college and university campuses. This isn’t about protecting conservative or liberal viewpoints. It’s about encouraging conservative and liberal viewpoints, and all viewpoints in between.

    Twenty-one colleagues of mine in the House have co-sponsored this resolution, and I will continue to work on growing that number.

    Fostering intellectual curiosity, robust debate, and passionate discussion on college campuses is vital for our nation’s strength and future. Passing this resolution will send a message to colleges and students throughout the country that the freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment are alive and well in the 21st century.

    Source link