• It All Depends on How You Interpret Islam - Not!

    It All Depends on How You Interpret Islam – Not!

    Apologists for Islam believe that the harmful aspects of Islam, such as jihad, killing apostates and hatred of Kafirs, can be made harmless by how you interpret the Islamic doctrine. This sounds great, but it is a weak argument. Just because you only want to interpret the “bad stuff” by denying it does not make the “bad stuff” go away. The harmful doctrine remains available for someone else to interpret the doctrine in a harmful manner.

    Source link

  • The Left and Islam

    The Left and Islam

    Why are the Left and Islam such allies? They have much in common and work as a team, but the Left is more harmful to us. The Left sees the world through the lens of oppressor and victim. Muslims are always the victim, never wrong. For instance, Muslims were the true victims in the jihad against the World Trade Towers on 9/11.

    For the Left the ends justify the means. For Islam if the action advances Islam then it is good. Both the Left or Islam are never at fault. Both hate Christians and Israel. Both want to annihilate our civilization and establish a utopia.

  • Dualism - Why Is Islam So Confusing?

    Dualism – Why Is Islam So Confusing?

    Islam seems very confusing since it is so contradictory. It is supposed to be the religion of peace yet practices brutal jihad when needed. Part of Islamic doctrine includes wife beating, yet there are hadiths that say not to hit Muslim women. Which is it? What is the real Islam?

    The answer to that question is a “yes” to both. Islamic doctrine is based on contradiction. I call this acceptance of contradiction Islamic dualism. Islam has all the good you hear about and also all the bad you hear about. The true nature of Islam is dualism, or contradiction. This makes Islam very powerful because it can present whatever “face” is advantageous.

  • Taqiyya (Sacred Deception): A historical example

    Taqiyya (Sacred Deception): A historical example

    Excellent scholarly paper on taqiyya (sacred deception) or dissimulation using the example of the Moriscos, Sunni converts to Christianity in 15th and 16th century Spain. This concept of concealing one’s true feelings or intentions is doctrinally available for use by both Sunnis and Shiites.

    Dissimulation in Sunni Islam and Morisco Taqiyya
    by Devin Stewart

    This study provides an outline of the religious doctrine of taqiyya or dissimulation in Sunni Islam, drawing on Qur,anic commentaries, hadith compilations, legal manuals, and ethical treatises. Moriscos and the North African jurists who advised them had access to discussions of taqiyya and the closely connected legal dispensation of coercion (ikrah) through these sources, many of which were well known in al-Andalus before the Reconquista, and some of which continued to be popular afterwards.

  • Islamic Doctrine of Women: Why I am not a “feminist”

    Islam proudly claims it was the first to give women their rights and that women are honored and protected. Well, it must be true. So what are the rights of women under the Sharia?

    Islamic women’s rights include:
    • The right for her testimony to be half that of a man.
    • The right to be beaten by her husband
    • FGM
    • Kafir women have the right to be sex slaves
    • The right to be in a harem

    Modern feminists do not criticize anything about Islam and women. Wife beating, as an example, is simply a cultural thing and all cultures are the same.

  • The Jihad is Not Going Away

    The Jihad is Not Going Away

    If you thought jihad would taper off, think again. These events–London attack, France attack, Sweden arson carbeques–happened this week alone. All of these attacks are victories for Islam. When no powerful forces oppose Islam, violent jihad is relentless. Weakness is chum to jihadi sharks.

    More and more, we hear less and less about these jihad events because the state and media censor this news. Or, they twist the truth into “newspeak” words that mean nothing. The jihadis are called “terrorists” or mentally unstable and the motives are unknown.

    Throughout Britain, France, Germany, and Sweden, jihadis have full reign. The only way there will be fewer attacks is when those in power recognize why the jihad is happening and understand its root cause–the Islamic doctrine.

  • If a Muslim Imitates Mohammed is He Crazy?

    If a Muslim Imitates Mohammed is He Crazy?

    It is common now after a jihad attack that law enforcement automatically announce the perpetrator is mentally unstable, not a jihadist.

    For example, in the latest terror attack in Toronto, police stated the shooter Faisal Hussein struggled with mental illness. They say this because they believe it to be true. They believe it to be true since law enforcement only uses Muslim Brotherhood, Sharia-compliant trainers to teach about jihad and Islam. The enemy is training the very people who are supposed to protect us.

    Are all jihadists crazy? No. If law enforcement officers were trained on the source doctrine of Koran and Sunna of Mohammed (the Sira and Hadith), they would know that Mohammed committed 95 acts of jihad in the last 9 years of his life.

  • Islam: The Universal Empire of Savagery

    Islam: The Universal Empire of Savagery

    Islam: The Universal Empire of Savagery, Sophistry, and Sacrilege

    By Panini

    Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments

    anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam, regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology and program. …

    Islam requires the earth—not just a portion, but the whole planet.

    —Syed Abul A’ala Maududi, Jihad in Islam

    I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve.

    Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.

  • England's Parliament Refuses To Condemn Islamic Rape Gangs

    England’s Parliament Refuses To Condemn Islamic Rape Gangs

    Random House decided not to publish a controversial book about Islam because it might seize on and amplify anti-Islam sentiments.

    And in England, only 20 of the 650 Members of Parliament would sign an open letter urging action on the “grooming scandal” (actually what should be called the Islamic rape and sex trafficking gangs).

    These two items have a common bond—fear of offending Muslims and antagonizing the apologists who call any criticism about Islam racist “Islamophobia”. Random House and the 630 MPs are ruled by fear. Random House does not care about freedom of ideas and freedom of speech. The 630 MPs, who would not sign a letter defending the human rights of hundreds of young British girls, do not care about justice for these victims.

  • Trump Was Right To Blow Up The Iran Deal

    Trump Was Right To Blow Up The Iran Deal

    For starters, it wasn’t a treaty.

    Like most of Barack Obama’s legacy, the Iran Deal was brittle and unsustainable because it was undertaken unilaterally. Even with the creation of a media echo chamber and the ugly, relentless attacks on critics, the former president was unable to pull together a consensus. The Obama administration circumvented that accountability. For that reason alone, it’s a good thing Trump nixed the deal.

    Even as John Kerry was acquiescing to one Iranian demand after the next, a number of senators explained to the despots in Tehran that such a deal could be easily scuttled. Nearly every Republican candidate running for the presidency in 2016 — not to mention nearly every GOP candidate running for the Senate — promised to withdraw from (or renegotiate) the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action if they won.

  • The Gravity of Mohammed

    The Gravity of Mohammed

    The protests in Iran are not only about economics and politics, they’re also about Islam. Iran in the 1960’s saw mini skirts, smiling women with uncovered hair, men and women freely holding hands on university campuses, and in the air, there was a sense that progress was possible. Then the Shah was deposed during the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and the Ayatollah and imams came to power. Iran had been purified, returned to its Islamic roots of Mohammed. Today, we are witnessing the Persian people rise up again against the Iranian Islamic regime and say “no more”. How will this play out?

  • A Refresher Talk on Political Islam

    A Refresher Talk on Political Islam

    Hello, I would like to talk to you about Islam, but in particular, I would like to talk to you about political Islam and explain to you why the religion of Islam is of no concern to you, unless you’re a Muslim. But let’s ask a more basic question, is there some way that we can use rational, fact-based reasoning on Islam? Because notice carefully that the current methods are very subjective. How do people learn about Islam? Well, they go to an expert and this expert hopefully is a Muslim and then they tell ’em what Islam is, but notice something, you get the answer about what Islam is, depending on who you ask, if you ask a Jihadist, you get one answer, if you ask a professional engineer at work, you get another answer, so this method is subjective and I want to propose to you, that there is a completely objective way to answer all questions about Islam.

  • The Trap Door to Escape Sharia

    The Trap Door to Escape Sharia


    There is constant pressure from Islam for Kafirs to submit to the Sharia. Most Kafirs think that if we accommodate their demands, then Muslims will be satisfied, and we can go back to our lives.  Wrong answer. The pressure from Islam will never cease until there is 100% submission. Bukhari Book 58, Hadith 3: “…Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you until you worship Allah alone or pay the Jizya (the dhimmi tax)…”  Translation: the pressure from Islam for Sharia will stop when all humanity converts to Islam or submits to the Sharia by being a dhimmi. 

  • We Need Heroes

    We Need Heroes

    I just got through watching a video by one of my personal heroes, Anni Cyrus. Now, why do I call her a hero? Well, I did something very unusual this week. I went to see a movie about Jihad in Europe called the 15:17 to Paris. These were real heroes because these were flawed people. People who have their own problems, but when the time came to be courageous, they moved in the face of fear. Now before this video where a lot of previews of movies that are coming to this theater and I was struck by, although they talk about heroes leaves are not real heroes.

  • Lord Pearson: "Can We Talk about Islam?"

    Lord Pearson: “Can We Talk about Islam?”

    Lord Pearson: “Can We Talk about Islam?”

    Lord Pearson: My Lords, I beg you to ask the questions standing in my name on the order paper.

    Lord Apologist: My Lords, the government funded Center of Expertise on Child Sexual Abuse is working to build a more informed picture of the scale of these crimes and preventing them is a priority for the government. The independent Office for Police Conduct is currently conducting investigations into 33 police officers of varying ranks for potential criminal offenses and breaches of the standards of professional behavior linked to the Rotheram case.

    Lord Pearson: My Lords, I fear that reply is shamefully inadequate, because these girls are usually raped several times a day, and so if we accept the views of our lead police officer for child protection, of Rotheram’s MP, and of the recent JM Quilliam reports, we seem to be looking at millions of rapes of white and Sikh girls by Muslim men.